UK-based independent AI efficiency projectEvidence before claims · 2026

Cached Input: Preserve the Provider’s Separate Usage Field

PROVIDER-SPECIFIC ACCOUNTING · ONE ZERO IS NOT A GENERAL RULE

Cached Input: Preserve the Provider’s Separate Usage Field

A long-scroll visual companion to the article. It summarizes the article evidence boundary and method; it does not extend the underlying result.

At a glance

Cached Input: Preserve the Provider’s Separate Usage FieldFour-step visual: UNCACHED INPUT; CACHED INPUT; OUTPUT; DATED RATE RULES. Zero cached input is specific to the single canary; this is not evidence that cache never occurs or is free.PROVIDER-SPECIFIC ACCOUNTING · ONE ZERO IS NOT A GENERAL RULE1UNCACHED INPUT2CACHED INPUT3OUTPUT4DATED RATE RULESEvidence labels and limits travel with the visual.
Keep cached input distinct from uncached input and output so provider accounting is not double-counted.

Evidence in scope

  • One canary: 0 cached input
  • Provider definitions vary
  • Do not infer cache eligibility from prompt reuse

Evidence boundary: Zero cached input is specific to the single canary; this is not evidence that cache never occurs or is free.

How to use the diagram

Record returned fields, model/version, pricing source date, cache eligibility, and any separate cache-write category.

What this visual explains: Keep cached input distinct from uncached input and output so provider accounting is not double-counted.

What it does not establish

No universal caching behavior or allowance-efficiency correlation is established.

← View article · Return to source article