UK-based independent AI efficiency projectEvidence before claims ยท 2026

Stall Detection: Check, Reconcile, Then Decide

DESIGN GUIDANCE ยท NO DETECTOR BENCHMARK

Stall Detection: Check, Reconcile, Then Decide

A long-scroll visual companion to the article. It summarizes the articleโ€™s evidence boundary and method; it does not extend the underlying result.

At a glance

Stall Detection: Check, Reconcile, Then DecideFour-step visual: OBSERVE SIGNALS; CHECKPOINT AGE; RECONCILE OUTCOME; VERIFY OR ESCALATE. A proposed operating method, not a measured production watchdog or universal timeout recommendation.DESIGN GUIDANCE ยท NO DETECTOR BENCHMARK1OBSERVE SIGNALS2CHECKPOINT AGE3RECONCILE OUTCOME4VERIFY OR ESCALATEEvidence labels and limits travel with the visual.
Separate process liveness from durable semantic progress. Before resending an uncertain request, determine whether the prior attempt took effect.

Evidence in scope

  • Stage-specific checkback
  • Useful-long-tail ceiling
  • Ambiguous outcomes: inspect before retry

Evidence boundary: A proposed operating method, not a measured production watchdog or universal timeout recommendation.

How to use the diagram

Set a checkback and hard ceiling per stage, persist checkpoints, reconcile any ambiguous external effect, and verify the artifact.

What this visual explains: Separate process liveness from durable semantic progress. Before resending an uncertain request, determine whether the prior attempt took effect.

What it does not establish

No detector precision, saved time, or universally safe number of seconds is measured.

โ† View article ยท Return to source article